This is totally unrelated to Jolla, which is a private company. We are talking about the future of the community.
2012/7/11 S. Howard <[email protected]> > This will also apply to MeeGo/JollaMobile efforts? > > Howard. > > On 10/07/2012 17:06, robert bauer wrote: > > Hello, > > In order to continue the community at www.maemo.org in the future, it > will be necessary to migrate much of the infrastructure and associated > elements to a new site and to establish a separate entity for that > purpose. See generally http://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php?t=84933. The > attached bylaws are proposed for discussion. Please note that this is > primarily a legal document and this is not the appropriate place to discuss > many of the issues associated with the actual migration of the community. > > The first thing you may notice is the name. Because Maemo is trademarked > by Nokia and we don't want to experience problems, or even delay, while the > issue is worked out, we have decided to suggest Hildon Foundation as the > name. There is also a recognition that Maemo may be regarded as having > commercially tarnished by Nokia's negligence of the software, and so it > might be good to use a different name in any event. Either one of the > domain names www.maemocommunity.org and www.hildonfoundation.org have > been registered and will be available for the community if we choose to use > them. > > Because this is a legal document, the discussion of the mission is broadly > stated in historical context so that the entity has much flexibility. > Although Maemo and Hildon are mentioned, this should not be regarded as any > implication at all that Qt, Harmattan, CSSU, Cordia, kp, or any other > specific software related to Maemo will not be supported by the entity. > > The operations of the NPE allow it to cooperate with Nokia, Jolla, or > other commercial entity. However, the entity is obligated to itself > permanently be an open source organization. > > Perhaps the section of most interest and discussion will be Membership and > Governance. It is suggested that we keep the present "open" nature of the > maemo community to the extent practical. But this is not meant to be > predetermined and alternative structures may be proposed and adopted. It is > also unknown whether a voting mechanism opf the current maemo > infrastructure will continue to be available. The composition of the > initial Board also needs to be carefully determined and this is surrounded > by brackets. > > The finances and budgets will be worked out once the entity is in place > and can establish a bank account. > > The jurisdiction does not dictate the location of the servers or > repositories, or the nationality of the Board members. Pennsylvania is > suggested because it has more lax requirements than Delaware and better > suited for smaller organizations. Europe is also available and so the > jurisdiction is surrounded by brackets. The main considerations are speed > and start-up costs. > > Council discussed a prior draft of the bylaws at its July 6 meeting and > you may refer to the logs for that discussion. Please don't take offense > if an issue important to you has not been mentioned in this mail - please > raise it and discuss it as you wish. > > Rob (SD69) > > > > > _______________________________________________ > maemo-community mailing > [email protected]https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-community > > > > > _______________________________________________ > maemo-community mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-community > > -- Iván Gálvez Junquera
_______________________________________________ maemo-community mailing list [email protected] https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-community
