Woody14619 kirjoitti 2014-09-22 22:40:
Again, I advocate for the complete separation of the two. Council is
Council
and does it's thing, making requests of the e.V., with no direct
control or
influence. The GA/e.V. are separate and own/operate m.o on the
communities
behalf, once taking that responsibility from HiFo. Simple, clean,
requires no
referendums, and keeps Council political crap out of e.V.
I think this nicely sums out the situation.
I have been thinking of this as we decided to have the referendum that'd
clear out the council election problem, but maybe we have been trying to
go at it from the wrong angle. I wanted to have the Maemo Council as a
real ruling body, but it looks like it is not necessary as we already
have Maemo e.V. as the successor of Hildon Foundation to take care of
that.
If council is to have the same role it had when Nokia was still the
supreme acting agent in all things Maemo, we really need to change
nothing.
The only hindurance I see here is organizational complexity; we now have
2 different entities, Maemo e.V. and Maemo Council, both having to hold
separate elections by different electorate by their rulings.
Additionally the members of the Maemo Council may be frustrated by the
fact that the councillors have no real power except as to advice/request
actions of Maemo e.V.
- Juice -
_______________________________________________
maemo-community mailing list
maemo-community@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-community
