> Like Dirk already replied, the implementation is in macros in the .h > file.
I see. That makes the comparison with memcpy somewhat unfair, since you are not actually providing replacement functions, so this would only make difference for -O3 type optimatisation (where you trade speed for size); it would be interesting to see what the performance difference is if you add the C prologue and epilogue.# BTW, you can instruct gcc to use inlined assembler version of its memcpy and friends as well, I think -O3 includes this, but if I read bits/string.h correctly in my sbox, there are no such inlined functions on the arm though, so there is certainly value in doing this. Tomas _______________________________________________ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
