On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 08:20:53PM -0300, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
> On 2/22/07, Eero Tamminen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >ext Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
> >> yes, but the most harmful action is to add "/" to be scanned, but
> >> that's in blacklist so it's avoided.
> >
> >If it is monitoring file changes in the device, you should also
> >ignore at least /dev & /sys*, otherwise your process wakes up
> >unnecessarily (which drains battery).
>
> Sure, we ignore:
>
> static const gchar *blacklist[] = {
> "/bin",
> "/boot",
> "/dev",
> "/etc",
> "/lib",
> "/proc",
> "/root",
> "/sbin",
> "/sys",
> "/usr/bin",
> "/usr/sbin",
> "/usr/etc",
> "/usr/lib",
> NULL
> };
I'm somewhat surprised that you scan /var and /tmp. Or, in fact,
anything outside /home and /media.
We're talking about Canola scanning for media files, right?
Marius Gedminas
--
If the code and the comments disagree, then both are probably wrong.
-- Norm Schryer
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
