[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Sorry, that is not 100% correct. At least I stressed the need for an
> autobuilder, too. I think I made that very clear in my mails. And I think
> most other people were in favour of it, too. IMHO Nobody would deny the
> advantage.
"Ferenc Szekely" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> we don't ignore it at all. please follow and commen Misha's thread
> about the autobuilder.
> in case you have a solution then please let us know. we will make sure
> that you can set it up for extras.
I'm sorry if I was overly categorical there. I have been following
the "repositories mess" discussion, but I haven't read every word of
every post, so I certainly could have missed things. I feel that with
a working auto-build system, many of the process issues that are being
discussed in fine detail would simply disappear, or at least become
less important; therefore it has seemed odd to me that there is so
much discussion of those issues, and relatively little (till now) of
auto-building.
But, as you say, it looks like this is now being addressed. Over to
the new auto-builder thread...
Regards,
Neil
_______________________________________________
maemo-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
