Same here, C++ has too many confusing features, is bloated, creates bloated object code, and meaning isn't always clear. And above all, it's library-incompatible with itself...
C++ is never a good choice nowadays, IMHO. Cheers, Martin 2008/1/29, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Tue, 29 Jan 2008, Klaus Rotter wrote: > > > Well, it is (to me) more a question of C vs C++. I started with C about > > twenty years ago and liked it a lot. But some of the features of C++ in > > addition with Qt are IMHO more "elegant", if you use a OO toolkit with > > an OO language like C++. E.g. methods overloading (which is really nice). > > > > But I often think C++ has to many features (for sure I didn't know them > > all) and it is bloated whereas I think I know pretty much features of C. > > > Same for me: C++ has too many features; too bloated. > > > -- > Aj. > > _______________________________________________ > maemo-developers mailing list > maemo-developers@maemo.org > https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers > _______________________________________________ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
