Hi, Jeremiah Foster wrote: > On May 2, 2009, at 16:11, Glen Ditchfield wrote: >> If packages don't have to have bug trackers, then QA will have to >> build some >> infrastructure to keep track of positive and negative votes, and the >> packager's comments on the negative votes, and declarations that the >> problems >> that caused the negative votes have been fixed ... maybe it would >> be easier >> to require that packages have bug trackers, and use them for QA? > > Who is going to build all of this infrastructure? Won't this type of > requirement help create separate private repos?
Isn't this bugs.maemo.org? Is there a good reason not to use this for Maemo packaging issues? For bugs in the software, the individual package's bug tracker is more appropriate - I hate to see bugs aggregate in a distribution's bug tracking system & never make it upstream to the people who know how to fix them. Cheers, Dave. -- maemo.org docsmaster Email: dne...@maemo.org Jabber: bo...@jabber.org _______________________________________________ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
