Hi David On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 5:00 PM, David Greaves <[email protected]> wrote:
> Antonio Aloisio wrote: > > Hi David, > > > > IMHO most of the extended hildon widgets could be dropped. > > Hildon widgets like hildon banners instead need to be integrated inside > Qt. > Agreed - there are many Qt widgets which could simply be hildonised. > I wonder about session management and hibernation for example. But I haven't wrote anything about the hibernation yet. But I had something similar but not related to the memory consumation. BTW in order to use that class ( and I think the hibernation too) the developer will use QSettings in a slot... but we'll talk more about these asa this work will be published. > > > Extended widget could be shipped in an external library if necessary.. > > but I won't care about them. > Sadly the version 5 gallery includes lots of deprecated widgets and few (if > any) > new ones: > http://maemo.org/api_refs/5.0/beta/hildon/ch02.html > Some make sense though and I'd like to see them up for community > contribution?ven > Ideally there would be agreement on which and what API would be acceptable > and > then refinement of implementation. We can do a TODO list and then define what of the new widgets we want to have in Qt. But some of them will be available, I'm going to have a separate package for them. Those widgets as the Maemo system specific libs will be shipped in an extra package. I hope that you agree with this. > About IPC Qt classes for system interaction.. I working on them... > Is this something that can be put up on the wiki? > > What's planned (ever) and where we are? I' haven't published them yet. They are in my internal repos... I can't tell more for now.. Antonio -- Mitch Hedberg<http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/authors/m/mitch_hedberg.html> - "My fake plants died because I did not pretend to water them."
_______________________________________________ maemo-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
