ext Graham Cobb <g+...@cobb.uk.net> writes: > On Thursday 29 October 2009 11:12:45 Marius Vollmer wrote: >> ext Alberto Mardegan <ma...@users.sourceforge.net> writes: >> >> b) A control file field makes the most sense to >> >> control the build process. >> > >> > Agreed. >> >> I think dedicated files in debian/ are better, like the >> debian/<package>.install files, etc. > > There is a difference. A debian/optify is fine for controlling how > maemo-optify works. A control field is more logical for controlling how the > auto-builder works: i.e. should it call maemo-optify at all, should it reject > the package because it claims to be optified but there are not files in /opt, > etc.
I was thinking that the auto-builder would always calls maemo-optify, and maemo-optify would do the rest: decide whether to do anything, check for correct optification, etc. Also, Debian tools might complain about a non-standard header. But I can see your point, too. I'll change it to use a header from debian/control and see how that goes. _______________________________________________ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
