Till Harbaum wrote:
> there's another problem with the testing i am facing with gpxview: Nonsense
> ratings.
> GPXView got a "thumbs down" for needing lots of porting to match the maemo6
> gui.
> Yes, harmattan! Why the heck should a fremantle program not be forwarded to
> extras due to the fact that it will be hard to port it to qt (which is what
> that guy
> is imho trying to say)?
>
> I am considering to entirely ignore the test process until this
> testing/promotion thing
> has actually proven to be useful. Dealing with people that just rate nonsense
> issues is
> a) a waste of time and b) frustrating.
In addition, testers - whether they rate nonsense issues or not -
even get positive karma! It feels little unfair. I really would like to
see a discussion about the responsibilities and ethics of a tester, and
possible procedures to make sure that a tester is behaving as expected.
BR,
Henrik
--
Henrik Hedberg - http://www.henrikhedberg.net/
_______________________________________________
maemo-developers mailing list
maemo-developers@maemo.org
https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
