> > > Also, the idea that an application can both be "low quality" and "end > > > user ready" is a bizarre. > > > > I completely agree with Graham Cobb here, Extras should contain apps > > that work no matter how pretty or poorly spelled they are. > > To repeat myself, this is not really the issue here. Some testers might get > carried away (at which point they need to be corrected), but the testing > guidelines are quite clear about certain things being blockers, and others > (like aforementioned spelling and general prettiness) not. There are > borderline cases (like icons, bugtrackers, etc) but still, > those are just shades of gray, they do not change the process fundamentally.
Ok, I'm quite happy with that, my only issue is with the repeated use of the words "Quality of an app" which means different things to different people (as shown by the way reviewers, and we, act and respond differently). > Regards, > Attila Cheers, Simon _______________________________________________ maemo-developers mailing list maemo-developers@maemo.org https://lists.maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-developers
