On 11/30/06, Gary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jonathan Matthews-Levine wrote:
> Remembering, of course, that 99%+ of the 770s sold have been,
> IMHO, *not* on contract, but with the end user paying the full retail
> price.
Why would the 770 be sold by mobile phone companies in the first place?
And if so, why would there be a service agreement tied to it?
That was sort of my *point* :-)
I was attempting (badly!) to make the point that the usual product
pattern for Nokia/SE/whoever - where they release some new,
interesting device and then release incremental/facelift upgrades
that'll support themselves through the artificially buoyed up market
of telco contracts - may not be very well suited to the full-price,
no-contract-available 770 upgrade.
Following from this *and* the 770's fairly (let's be nice :-)) /niche/
market, the 870/780/880/whatever needs to be both a compelling device
for new buyers AND a compelling upgrade for existing 770 owners!
All IMHO, of course :-)
Jonathan
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"That sounds vaguely obscene, and if there's one thing I
cannot *stand*, it's vagueness." -- Dean Grennell
_______________________________________________
maemo-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://maemo.org/mailman/listinfo/maemo-users
