Le samedi 25 septembre 2010 à 07:49 +1200, Graham Lauder a écrit : > On Friday 24 Sep 2010 12:38:41 Michael Scherer wrote: > > Le vendredi 24 septembre 2010 à 12:04 +1200, Graham Lauder a écrit : > > > Who do I talk to about setting up a Marketing Mail list > > > > We postponed the mls creation until we have a clear delimitation and > > understanding about the various sub groups who will need one, and until > > we can find what we can offer to those subgroups to collaborate ( ie, > > wiki, elgg, or any kind of tools, depending on the need, what is > > available and so on ). > > > > Marketing and communication somehow overlap if we look at the > > description on http://mageia.org/wiki/doku.php?id=marketing and > > http://mageia.org/wiki/doku.php?id=communication, > > communication and webteam may overlap ( as the web site is > > communication ), so could webteam and design, or design and > > communication. > > And webteam and sysadmin may also overlap too or at least, will require > > to discuss. > > My first reaction was "NOOOO, I want my exclusive MARKETING LIST!!" > (note caps and 2, yes two, exclamation marks. So restrained ;) ) > > But then my consideration is that you are right. We (people) tend to package > things in terms of job descriptions. This is a hangover from our offline > work > environment. > > Marketing, website, education, documentation, graphic design: all are > communication, so lets put them under a single mail list. The more I think > about it the more i like the synergies that would come out of that.
Well, we should better define task and subject of each mailling list. I was planning about -i18n, as we have a straight usage for this ( ie, people helping on website translation and so on, and later, translation of projects ). But for a communication ml, i think we need a goal/mission/whatever of the ml, so people can decide where to subscribe, etc. So if you have a proposal about this, do not hesitate ( a little bit more formal than the one of the wiki, if possible :) ). > > > > In the mean time, yes, a piratepad would be a solution. > > I would prefer collaboration on google docs but pirate pads realtime update > is a killer feature at this point and so I'll put up with the other > irritations. I would prefer pirate pad because this can be hosted on our own infrastructure later ( which can be important for web single sign on, to ensure the confidentiality if needed ), and because that's free software ( which is imho a important statement for a group that try to promote free software ). -- Michael Scherer _______________________________________________ Mageia-dev mailing list [email protected] https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev
