On 2 October 2010 04:26, David W. Hodgins <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, 01 Oct 2010 20:27:00 -0400, André Machado <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> However, is that only one version per year - with updates of course - it >> would >> be best for you? > > Another option, that just occurred to me. Rolling updates until > there is an update to something like glibc, that requires the > bulk of the rpm packages to need rebuilding. Then, and only > then, create a new iso/release, rather then using a set > schedule. > > Regards, Dave Hodgins >
That won't provide consistent release cycle/intervals. Better go with the 2 release/year model. The argument hasn't changed, the various components included in any Linux distro change too fast now, a release every 6 month appears to me to be the best way to go at the moment. -- Ahmad Samir
