Op maandag 06 december 2010 16:30:00 schreef Hoyt Duff: > On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 7:43 AM, Michael Scherer <[email protected]> wrote: > > And that's not the question, this is a basic usability issue, if a > > rather important portion of the users associate a word with something, > > this sound sane to no reuse the same word to hold a different meaning in > > a very similar context, or it will cause confusion. > > Again, a good argument for a name with no conflicts and no negative > meanings: "paris".
no negative meaning??? Paris Hilton anyone??? afaik any word has negative meaning...
