2010/12/8 Oliver Burger <[email protected]>: > Let's devide the repos in those packages, that can be distibuted everywhere > and those that can't and let the mirror maintainers chose if or if not they > are willing to mirror the second one.
That was one of the first suggestions in the whole discussion. The only problem there is that this again creates a problem with the mirrorlist system (I remember, I'm writing the same words now that I wrote some weeks ago!). So, we either abandon the mirrorlist approach or we have 2 mirrorlists (one with and one without tainted software) and let the user decide which one he sets up on his system. > And if you are suggesting not to provide all those packages (which are mostly > multimedia I think), I'm not with you. I do want a distribution, that can play > my music and videos and so on without having to build the software for > myself... +1 I am sure this goes for the majority of users. -- wobo
