On 2010-12-22, Michael Scherer <[email protected]> wrote: > Le mercredi 22 décembre 2010 à 00:32 +0100, Frederic Janssens a écrit : >> On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 17:07, Michael Scherer <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > Le mardi 14 décembre 2010 à 17:05 +0100, Dexter Morgan a écrit : >> > > I would like to have your input to let us able to provide a bugzilla >> > > really soon >> > >> > So if I am not wrong, in bugzilla, we have : >> > - products >> > - component, contained in products >> > - and various field, per bug, >> > >> > and the way we organize everything will impact the layout. >> > >> >> Yes. >> >> In preparation of the future interaction (by xmlrpc) between the >> mageia-app-db site and the mageia bugzilla, I have been testing >> http://bugs.mageia.org/ . >> Xmlrpc works, but it will be necessary to configure additional fields. >> The minimum would be to add an 'RPM Package' field (such as exists on >> https://qa.mandriva.com/). > > What about component not related to rpm ?
The 'RPM Package' field would be left blank. (usually many fields are left blank) > > And do you mean srpm or rpm ? On https://qa.mandriva.com/ anything goes. To permit consistent searches I think we should standardise. The aim would to be to as specific as needed but not more; as far as I know that would be : name-version-release unless the bug is architecture specific, where we would have : name-version-release.architecture > > We should also take in account package naming change. which change? > > -- > Michael Scherer > > -- Frederic
