Op woensdag 22 december 2010 23:25:16 schreef Samuel Verschelde: > Le mercredi 22 décembre 2010 22:58:44, andre999 a écrit : > > Maarten Vanraes a écrit : > > > Op woensdag 22 december 2010 20:38:06 schreef Ahmad Samir: > > >> On 22 December 2010 21:30, Renaud MICHEL<[email protected]> > > > > > > wrote: > > >>> On mercredi 22 décembre 2010 at 18:46, Ahmad Samir wrote : > > >>>>> Sorry for not beeing clear. > > >>>>> What I propose is not for the case 'a bug originates from more than > > >>>>> one package'; > > >>>>> but for the case 'a bug manifests itself in than one package'. > > > > If we agree that a bug can originate in more than one package, a > > multiline (multi-rpm) field could be useful. > > No need for a multiline field. If we agree that the field, by convention, > can contain one rpm name (common case) or more, separated by commas for > example, then it wont add complexity over the initial proposal from Ahmad > and would still allow people to flag more RPMs if they want. > > From the bug solving point of view, this would not add much benefit, but > for users it may bring some useful information, for example in > mageia-app-db. Indeed, like it was said earlier, if the problem shows in > package A but is in fact a bug in package B, it's still useful to have > package A mentioned so that we can say, on the package's page in > mageia-app-db "Hey, there's a known open bug for this package". > > > Regards > > Samuel Verschelde
good compromise
