On Friday, January 21, 2011 08:15:59 am Jerome Quelin wrote: > On 11/01/21 16:03 +0100, Michael scherer wrote: > > > i guess this'll be mitigated when: > > > a) more build nodes will be added to bs > > > > Well, we do have a limited rack space at lost oasis so we cannot > > add much server for the moment, and for now, I think we are planning > > others stuff with potential server ( and as people will ask it, no, we > > still do not plan to let people run a buildnode if the sysadmin team is > > not the only group of people to access to it as admin for security > > reason ). > > uh? you mean mageia will run with 1 bs node of each type, and that's it? > > > > b) bs will be updated to allow priorities, queue per submitter, etc. > > > (and i want a pony too) > > > > We do not have it ( except the pony ), but how should we be distribute > > build in a fair fashion ? I fear that having this would lead to some > > frustration ( while first in, first out is IMHO easy to understand and > > quite fair most of the time ). > > i don't know. stéphane télétchea wrote on cooker@ about a scheduler he's > using in his job with lots of fancy features. i guess he'll be able to > describe them in more details, and why we would want them. > > > note to packagers: it's now very easy to throttle in an adaptive way > (thanks to pascal terjean). just add the following before submitting a > package: > > sleep $( HEAD http://pkgsubmit.mageia.org/ | perl -nE '/X-BS-Throttle: > (\d+)/ && print $1' ) > > jérôme
Jerome, no complaints, you are great. I wish we would have more packagers like you. -- Thomas
