2011/3/4 Tux99 <[email protected]>: > > Well if you are happy with that then that's great for you. > Here are the stats of my mail server for a single week: > > 122 received > 126 delivered > 0 forwarded > 4 deferred (7 deferrals) > 0 bounced > 51124 rejected (99%) > > rejected is practically all spam and is a simple SMTP reject of blocked or > non-existent email addresses, not content based spam filtering.
Well, you must have been to places :) Our mailserver (catering to @mandrivauser.de) does not show such figures. The percentage of our mailserver shows 56.16% accepted, 43.84 rejected. Of these accepted mails our spam filter shows 20% spam (average). Accordingly the server does not waste recognizable power on the mail system. Maybe with such a setup as yours and such results I may think about changing something, I'd not accept such a situation. Anyhow, this is going too far away from the real issue of this thread and besides it is not really taking us somewhere at all. -- wobo
