sön 2011-03-13 klockan 21:55 +0200 skrev Tux99: > > During the review with my mentor Anssi of one of the packages I'm working > on, the question came up what the appropriate repository for a package is > that's both non-free (open source but not a FOSS license) and tainted > (contains sw. that is covered by patents in some parts of the world). > > Should a non-free+tainted package go in tainted, i.e. is the tainted repo > for all tainted packages, both free and non-free >
tainted, as thats a "bigger" issue than nonfree -- Thomas
