Le jeudi 17 mars 2011 à 18:24 -0400, andre999 a écrit : > nicolas vigier a écrit :
> > Also the "do not charge for it" would make it non free (but it does not > > seem to be mentioned in the "Modifications" section, only in the > > "Unaltered Binaries" section). > > Why would "do not charge for it" make it non-free ? > That doesn't seem to be a requirement of open source. Although charging > for it is generally permitted in unmodified open source licenses. So that mean that someone cannot ask money for selling a cdrom with it, since it would be charging for the software. That's clearly a restriction of usage. So we need to rebrand it. -- Michael Scherer
