On 8 April 2011 16:20, Oliver Burger <[email protected]> wrote: > Thierry Vignaud <[email protected]> schrieb am 08.04.2011 >> On 8 April 2011 16:05, Ahmad Samir <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> So I'd like to ask you, what you think, we should do? >> >> - package mariadb as an alternative for mysql >> >> - package mariadb nd drop mysql or >> >> - stay with mysql and not package mariadb at all at least for >> >> the time being >> >> >> >> By the way, if any of my words reads a bi peculiar, the "a" key >> >> on my keyboard isn't working all the time, so try adding an "a" >> >> while you read it :D >> > >> > About option 2, can't be dropped at the moment, as e.g. Amarok >> > requires it. >> >> I would expect it to be binary compatible with mysql. > According to its website it "offers drop-in replacement functionality > for MySQL". > > Oliver >
What I meant was not to drop mysql until we're sure Amarok builds/works/doesn't-barf with MariaDB. -- Ahmad Samir
