> I don't think we should have a "games" group. It makes sense to have > groups for packages that needs to be maintained together, for instance > KDE apps and KDE libraries should be maintained by the same group of > people. But for games, it is independent applications that could be > maintained by different people, so I don't think all games should be > maintained by the same group. It was only an example, not a group suggestion ;) But another example could be kde-devel libs and other c-c++ devel libs (e.g. commoncpp2, ucommon, boost,...). Anyway i agree on the fact that game could not be useful :)
Angelo
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
