Op vrijdag 22 april 2011 10:30:45 schreef Colin Guthrie: > 'Twas brillig, and Ahmad Samir at 22/04/11 03:16 did gyre and gimble: > > On 22 April 2011 03:12, Michael Scherer <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> it seems that libreoffice do not rebuild fine and so people keep > >> submitting it ( me included, but I think I fixed it ). It is starting to > >> fill ecosse disk ( which is between 90 and 95% full now ), and I suspect > >> that adding a 300 mo src.rpm on valstar on each compilation is not gonna > >> be good ( puppet is already taking a long time to clean older log ) > >> > >> So : > >> 1) do we really need to keep the src.rpm as part as the build error ? > >> I never used it since the build system was deployed. > > > > I never used the src.rpm from an failed build, ever. Usually I have > > the svn checkout on the HDD anyway... > > > > So, I agree about deleting the src.rpm of failed builds (if my opinion > > counts in this area). > > Yup I second Ahmad. I've never used the src.rpm ever. > > Col
i've used it 3 times to find out why it was building locally and not with buildsystem... i'm almost sure the local one would have worked just the same, but i didn't want to take any chances at the time, and it was there, so i just had to dl it...
