On 22 April 2011 15:03, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote: > > > ----Messaggio originale---- > Da: [email protected] > Data: 22-apr-2011 13.50 > A: "Mageia development mailing-list"<[email protected]> > Ogg: Re: [Mageia-dev] looking for developer to create a packager to online > update from mandriva to mageia > > 2011/4/22 [email protected] <[email protected]>: >> hi, >> >> i'm looking for some developers/testers who are interested in creating a >> simply rpm package that should installed in mandriva 2010.2 system (that >> doesn't work in previous releases) that: >> >> - remove mandriva sources >> - add mageia sources >> - start mageiaupdate (or the equivalent of mandrivaonline) >> >> reference: https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=886 >> >> possible implementation (quick proposal of tmb): >> >> * urpmi –auto-update path would be an online update >> >> * maybe a patched mdkonline could be provided too for separate download >> >> is there any person who is interested in it? thank you > > Please stop this kind of mail... We are already preparing mdkonline on > that purpose. Wait for it to be ready > >> >> >> cheers, >> Marcello >> > > > > -- > Anne > http://www.mageia.org > > i don't understand you, anne... wasn't you that told me: > > "Find more people for it then. Otherwise wait for it to be ready" >
She most likely meant "find more people to continue the package cleaning that has already started some weeks ago but the people* who worked on it are buried to their chins doing many other tasks in preparation for the official release". * that would be dmorgan (who started the cleaning), who works on LibreOffice, Texlive, Java and Maven (i.e. enough stuff to drive anyone mad already :)), beside other stuff. > i was only doing that. if mdkonline is in a preparation phase you should > use: > > "We are working on mdkonline adapted for this specific case", Which you should have guessed... since Mageia is using rpmdrake, drakxtools, drakx-net... etc, after having been cleaned. :) > not > "We should use mdkonline adapted for this specific case", because this way i > understand only a proposal, nothing concrete. > > > cheers, > Marcello > -- Ahmad Samir
