On 08.06.2011 23:23, Ahmad Samir wrote: > On 8 June 2011 21:45, Samuel Verschelde <[email protected]> wrote: >> Le mercredi 8 juin 2011 19:39:55, Ahmad Samir a écrit : >> >>> IMHO, rejection reasons: >> >>> - The sec team doesn't think the update fixes a serious security >> >>> vulnerability; so it's not updates but backports >> >> What about bugfix updates ? I guess fixing a bug is a valid reason for an >> update, like it was in Mandriva's updates. >> >> Regards >> >> Samuel > > Right, I probably phrased that one wrongly; I meant: > fixes a serious bug, e.g. crashing, segfaulting
I don't think we should exclude non-serious bugs :) (or version updates in some cases, like firefox/opera/flash or updating an rc/beta version to a stable one, and maybe some online games that are useless unless on latest version) -- Anssi Hannula
