2011/6/9 JA Magallón <[email protected]>: > On Thu, 09 Jun 2011 10:49:18 +0100, Colin Guthrie <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> 'Twas brillig, and Wolfgang Bornath at 09/06/11 10:25 did gyre and gimble: >> > 2011/6/9 JA Magallón <[email protected]>: >> >> >> >> No need, Cauldron is Cauldron. The only strange thing is that I had >> >> heard on other threads that update to Gnome 3 was being discussed, >> >> but never realized it had finally agreed on. >> > >> > Same here, I'm a bit surprised. >> >> We're on the next cycle now. Quite frankly I'd be stunned (and hugely >> disappointed) if we *didn't* have Gnome 3! >> >> Providing a Gnome2 environment or not is likely the point that need >> discussion :D >> > +1 > > One question: > > xps:/etc/X11/wmsession.d# ll > total 16 > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 131 2011.06.08 11:00 02GNOME > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 116 2011.03.25 00:36 06Xfce > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 177 2011.06.08 11:31 11GNOME3 > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 118 2011.02.07 22:12 29drak3d > xps:/etc/X11/wmsession.d# rpm -qf * > gnome-session-3.0.1-1.mga2 > xfce-utils-4.8.1-5.mga1 > gnome-shell-3.0.2-1.mga2 > drak3d-1.30-1.mga1 > > What is the difference between bot gnomes ? IE, gnome-session and > gnome-shell-session ? > > Now we don't have gnome 2 (gnome 3 uninstalled almost everything), so ?
can you do a rpm -qf for 02GNOME please ?
