> - I am not sure on this part, but basically, we have 2 choices : > - the packager take the cauldron package and push to backport testing > - the packager move the cauldron package in svn to backport, and there > send it to backport testing. copy i believe. IIUC we should branch cauldron into stable relases for that package, but what happens if the package already exists? I mean foo 1.0.0 is in stable, a foo 1.1.0 is required and could be backported into stable branch... we have two foo programs with their own story. > WDYT ? I like the second option, but in such a way we should provide upgrades from a stable with backports, since they follow a good feedback policy before going to stable.
I understand QA and sysadmins are not overloaded, but there's not so much
difference between updates and backports then...
--
Angelo
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
