Le dimanche 26 juin 2011 à 10:57 +0200, Maarten Vanraes a écrit : > Op zondag 26 juni 2011 00:16:59 schreef Michael Scherer: > [...] > > > we > > > always say that backports should mainly be cherry picked, but not > > > enabled all the time... so how does installing a new version of e.g. > > > wine break the user's system when he can easily back out that rpm? > > > > I a not sure that most people realize they can revert. Maybe a easier > > interface to do that could be offered ( along maybe with a tool that > > send feedback on why it did downgrade it ? ). > > that's not a bad idea, what is the best way to revert? is that with --old- > package ?
urpme package; urpmi package > what if the package has been removed on mirrors? (ie: due to more recent > updates) Let me complete my proposal : 'revert to the version in release'. -- Michael Scherer
