On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 5:42 AM, Ahmad Samir <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2 July 2011 11:39, Daniel Kreuter <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 5:31 AM, Wolfgang Bornath <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> 2011/7/2 Daniel Kreuter <[email protected]>: >>>> Am 07/02/2011 11:12 AM, schrieb Kira: >>>>> 在 Sat, 02 Jul 2011 17:07:26 +0800, Daniel Kreuter >>>>> <[email protected]>寫道: >>>>> >>>>>> Hello guys, >>>>>> >>>>>> how can it be that there are bad rpm's in Cauldron? Sure it is a >>>>>> development build but shouldn't the rpm's be clean so that urpmi can >>>>>> install them? >>>>>> >>>>>> I can remember 2 examples of packages which failed: >>>>>> lib64kworkspace4 (4.6.90) >>>>>> lib64ktaskmanager >>>>>> >>>>>> Or are there error's while downloading the packages?? >>>>>> >>>>>> Greetings >>>>>> >>>>>> D. Kreuter >>>>> Error message? What did urpmi tell you? >>>> >>>> That this are bad rpm's and he failed to install them. >>> >>> Could you pls give the exact error message, not your interpretation? >>> If the error message was really "This is a bad rpm I can not install >>> it" then I heve not seen such a message before as long as I am using >>> *rpm* >>> >>> -- >>> wobo >>> >> >> http://pastebin.com/tTHmMz7b >> >> -- >> Mit freundlichen Grüßen >> >> Greetings >> >> Daniel Kreuter >> > > Looks like a bad download, clear the cache: > rm -fv /var/cache/urpmi/partial/{lib64taskmanager4,lib64kephal4}* > > then try again, urpmi will download them afresh. > > -- > Ahmad Samir >
But before i will wait until urpmi has finished the rest, after that i will try to install the new packages. I also got an error on webkit, he wasn't able to download it can someone check that pls (I don't have the version in my mind)? -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen Greetings Daniel Kreuter
