On 6 July 2011 12:10, Wolfgang Bornath <molc...@googlemail.com> wrote: > If we go back to the beginning of the discussion where to put such > packages which were in PLF we made a clear difference: > > 1. All non-free goes into non-free > > 2. Software which may be illegal in some countries (mostly because of > licensing) will go into tainted. > > That's all. Clear and simple. > > The question about GPL or other free licenses is not touched by > tainted. So, everything which does not have to go to tainted will go > to free (core) or non-free, depending on it's status. > > -- > wobo >
But PLF had free and non-free repos, whereas we only have tainted; our tainted is equivalent to PLF free, not PLF non-free, IIUC. -- Ahmad Samir