Le mercredi 13 juillet 2011 à 09:51 +0200, philippe makowski a écrit : > 2011/7/13 Michael scherer <[email protected]>: > > > > I would be in favor of treating python2 and python 3 as 2 differents > > languages. > > The rational is that : > > - we cannot garantee to have support for both > > - we will likely have some module who would be updated only on > > python 3 sooner or later > > - we will need to do upgrade of package at different time, since both > > python2 and python3 are > > released at different time. > > > > So rather than a complex scheme that will confuse packagers, just consider > > they > > are separate, and use the almost same policy ( with s/python/python3/ ) > And how do you manage package that support both P2 and P3 ? > (same source)
Either 2 rpms with the same source, or 1 rpm that generate 2 sub rpms. I would rather use 2 separate rpms, as this seems to be easier. -- Michael Scherer
