Le samedi 16 juillet 2011 à 11:42 +0200, Samuel Verschelde a écrit : > Le samedi 16 juillet 2011 02:45:04, Michael Scherer a écrit : > > Le samedi 16 juillet 2011 à 01:17 +0200, Samuel Verschelde a écrit : > > > Some packages must be submitted only to tainted. Is there already a way > > > to prevent a wrong submit to the core section, when a package builds > > > without buildrequires in tainted ? > > > > > > If yes, what is the way, and if not, shouldn't we define a standard way > > > to do that in the spec files ? > > > > We could add a requies to some dummy rpm that is present in tainted > > only. > > > > But I think this problem would not occurs often. If someone push it > > without saying where to go, it should go to the proper repository. > > > > And if someone push it to core, we should assume that he know what he > > does. There is no way to push by error to core, as you would need to add > > specific option ( iirc ). > > You mean that I can type "mdvsys submit transcode" and it will know that it > must not go to core but to tainted ? Based on what information ?
Based on the fact the package is already in tainted, iirc. It was the case in mandriva for contribs/main, so it should still work. -- Michael Scherer
