Le samedi 16 juillet 2011 à 16:37 +0200, Olivier Blin a écrit : > Michael Scherer <[email protected]> writes: > > > People on Fedora list were quite reluctant to changes ( to say the least > > ), and I am pretty sure that someone will hit a unrelated corner case in > > the last minute. Rtp was not really fond of systemd on arm and embedded > > system either. > > Do you have more details about the issues on arm/embedded? > How could it be worse than forking our dozens of shell scripts?
It isn't (IMHO), it is better to have systemd (IMHO). But that was a attempt to make rtp speak on the list ( like speaking of his proposal about flags ) :) His point (IIRC) was that adding cgroup to the kernel would have a small overhead, and big overhead are made of lots of smaller one. And (maybe) that systemd take ressources all the time, while shell scripts only take them on boot. On the other hand, we do not really target specific ultra specific embedded system for now, so this point may be moot. -- Michael Scherer
