On 18 July 2011 11:31, Anssi Hannula <anssi.hann...@iki.fi> wrote: > On 18.07.2011 08:20, Ahmad Samir wrote: >> On 18 July 2011 00:48, Anssi Hannula <anssi.hann...@iki.fi> wrote: >>> On 18.07.2011 00:04, JA Magallón wrote: >>>> On Sun, 17 Jul 2011 14:06:12 +0200 (CEST), Mageia Team >>>> <buildsystem-dae...@mageia.org> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Name : flash-player-plugin11 Relocations: (not relocatable) >>>>> Version : 11.0.1.60 Vendor: Mageia.Org >>>>> Release : 0.b1.071311.1.mga2.nonfree Build Date: Sun Jul 17 >>>>> 14:05:18 2011 >>>>> Install Date: (not installed) Build Host: jonund >>>>> Group : Networking/WWW Source RPM: (none) >>>>> Size : 11376 License: Proprietary >>>>> Signature : (none) >>>>> Packager : Mageia Team <http://www.mageia.org> >>>>> URL : http://www.adobe.com/products/flashplayer/ >>>>> Summary : Flash Player plugin for browsers - 11 Beta 1 release >>>>> Description : >>>>> Adobe Flash Player plugin for browsers. 11 Beta 1 release. >>>>> >>>>> NOTE: This package does not contain the Flash Player itself. The >>>>> software will be automatically downloaded from Adobe during package >>>>> installation. Alternatively you can use the command >>>>> "download-flash-player-plugin" manually. >>>>> >>>>> Installing this package indicates acceptance of the following documents: >>>>> - Flash Player 11 License, >>>>> http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/eula/flashplayer11.html >>>>> - Adobe.com Terms of Use, http://www.adobe.com/go/labs_term_of_use >>>>> - Adobe Online Privacy Policy, http://www.adobe.com/go/labs_privacy_policy >>>>> >>>>> anssi <anssi> 11.0.1.60-0.b1.071311.1.mga2: >>>>> + Revision: 125340 >>>>> - better obsoletes and conflicts >>>>> >>>>> + ahmad <ahmad> >>>>> - imported package flash-player-plugin11 >>>> >>>> Why does it try to pull phonon and half KDE ? >>>> >>> >>> Fixed and resubmitted, thanks. >>> >>> -- >>> Anssi Hannula >>> >> >> lib*kutils4 should be a suggests at least otherwise opening "Global >> Settings" from the right click menu on any e.g. youtube video will >> complain about the missing lib. > > Trrh, we don't want flash player suggesting kde. >
Agreed. > Does it complain about this if one removes the kcm module? > I tested a while ago, we'd have to remove both the kcm module .so and .desktop files; I am OK with that, the GTK+ tool provides the same exact functionalities and is desktop-agnostic (i.e. it won't pull any extra deps AFAICS). > -- > Anssi Hannula > -- Ahmad Samir