Le mercredi 20 juillet 2011 16:10:24, Michael Scherer a écrit : > Le mercredi 20 juillet 2011 à 13:31 +0000, Ahmad Samir a écrit : > > https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1882 > > > > --- Comment #15 from Ahmad Samir <[email protected]> 2011-07-20 > > 17:31:00 CEST --- (In reply to comment #14) > > > > > If people want someone from sysadmin team to react, maybe the team > > > should be in CC ? > > > We do not read every possible bug reports to see if by chance, someone > > > need our help. > > > > Then sysadm team should update the updates policy to state so, > > http://www.mageia.org/wiki/doku.php?id=updates_policy > > Well, the policy is not a step by step procedure, at least, it doesn't > look like one. > > But yes, the procedure should be amended.
There's a step by step procedure for QA validation here : http://www.mageia.org/wiki/doku.php?id=qa_updates Currently it says to assign to the security group for security bugs, and to let assigned to qa-bugs for other updates. Boklm reacted to that saying that there should be a way to differentiate updates being tested from updates needing to be pushed, and proposed to add a validated_update keyword for that. So now we need to decide what's best and do it :) Samuel
