Op donderdag 28 juli 2011 08:07:03 schreef Sander Lepik: > 27.07.2011 19:20, Maarten Vanraes kirjutas: > > Op woensdag 27 juli 2011 16:37:42 schreef Michael Scherer: > >> Hi, > >> > >> since both ennael and I are busy tonight, and since there is nothing > >> really really urgent to announce ( at least, nothing that couldn't be > >> discussed or dispatched on the ml ), I propose to postpone the meeting. > > > > that's fine by me, but i would still like to get a move on with > > backports, do we just OK stormi's proposal, or does this have to be > > decided by team leaders? > > There is also problem with the current handling of backports_testing. > AFAIK backports are submitted from 1/updates which doesn't make sense. > There should be 1/backports and mgarepo shouldn't accepts 1/updates for > backports. Or if 1/backports is too much asked then backports should be > submitted from cauldron. > > Correct me if i'm wrong.. > > -- > Sander
afaik, there are NO backports at all, there isn't even a backports SVN, (while there is an updates SVN)
