Op maandag 22 augustus 2011 13:08:26 schreef Kira: > 在 Mon, 22 Aug 2011 17:57:02 +0800, Colin Guthrie > > <[email protected]>寫道: > > Hello, > > > > I also have it on good authority that many of the features lacking in > > NetworkManager (such as bridging configuration) will be available in the > > not too distant future and many other more advanced networking features > > such as fast-start DHCP, per-interface DNS, 4-8's DNS fallback and > > several other nice features will ultimately be possible too. > > > > So with all this in mind, I think the writing is very much on the wall > > with regards to the future integration of NetworkManager into the > > desktop. I believe we will be able to concentrate our resources better > > by going along with the rest of the world in this regard. I have > > personally switched to it now (as I do not need advanced features of > > draknetcenter et al) as a step towards this. > > So what can draknet do while NM can't? > > If such a thing exist, I think abandon draknet is not a good idea, > > since it's much more integrate into MCC. Also, is it possible to > > combine them up, like using draknet to support manage the connection > > , letting NM replace the role of net_applet?
imho, the tools that are now available don't really work well together, ie: if you use multiple of those tools, likely they don't show correct status, etc... personally, i've used net_applet always and i would like to keep this.
