On Tue, 23 Aug 2011, Guillaume Rousse wrote: > On 22/08/2011 15:59, Thierry Vignaud wrote: >> btw as the config file was tagged as config(noreplace), upgrade breaks until >> one >> fix his config file. >> not that a big deal but that should be warned, or config(noreplace) should be >> replaced by config() > One could expect than packagers know how configuration files are managed, > and there is no point in circumventing usual packaging policy here 'just to > help'.
And what is the "usual packaging policy" ?
