Le jeudi 8 septembre 2011 14:24:38, Thierry Vignaud a écrit : > On 8 September 2011 13:52, Balcaen John <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Good question from MrsB : must we link only the needed binary RPMs, or > >> all those coming from the SRPM ? > >> > >> Example : qt4-database-plugin-sqlite-4.7.3-1.mga1.i586.rpm is needed, > >> will we link all packages from the qt4 SRPM or only > >> qt4-database-plugin- sqlite-4.7.3-1.mga1.i586.rpm ? The first option > >> is probably cleaner, but this means copy much more packages. > > > > Well we shoud links only the *requirements* for qt4-database-plugin- > > sqlite so probably not all qt4 packages (but most of them :/ ) > > No that would be only the *new requirements* of the updated package. > Eg: if amarok doesn't with XYZ devices work because we forgot to link it > with libXYZ, we should only copy libXYZ when uploading new amarok > package into updates
Maybe my question was not clear : qt4-database-plugin- sqlite-4.7.3-1.mga1.i586.rpm is needed *as a new requirement* of another updated package. Do we link only qt4-database-plugin- sqlite-4.7.3-1.mga1.i586.rpm from Core Release to Updates, or do we link all packages from its SRPM, which is qt4 ? Said otherwise : must we keep a coherence between RPMs and SRPMs in Core Updates ? Samuel
