Guillaume Rousse skrev 17.10.2011 10:34:
Le 17/10/2011 02:36, Johnny A. Solbu a écrit :
On Monday 17 October 2011 01:04, Pascal Terjan wrote:
The "Oops" line is not useful to someone reading the changelog.
It just means that you used two commits to "Update patches" instead of
one, that does not need to appear in changelog so should be SILENCEd.
So if I comit a silent "oops patch" as the only reason and update release
version as a result, won't someone starts complain that I didn't provide a reason for the
commit?
(I often see this on the cooker list)
You're confusing svn changelog and package changelog. An svn comment
message with a 'SILENT' prefix will only hide changes in package changelog.
Well, if it's the only change between two releases (assuming the build
succeeded with the "broken patch") then the commit to fix the patch
should _not_ be SILENT.
--
Thomas
