on Sat, 15 Oct 2011 09:24 in the Usenet newsgroup gmane.linux.mageia.devel Samuel Verschelde wrote:
[snip] > They weren't required according to urpmq --requires-recursive, but there's a > limitation in urpmq --requires-recursive when there are alternatives : if > package A requires B or C, then urpmq won't list the dependencies of B and C > recursively. Some call that a bug, I prefer to call that a "how the hell > could > we do differently?" feature :) There could be an interactive option and ask questions like urpmi does. There could be an, "accept first choice" option. There could be a list of selections passed as a command line option. There could be an option to include all possible choices (and label the resulting list as possibly excessive). Continue with current behaviour and label the result as incomplete when this happens, maybe listing the un-made choices. > Best regards > > Samuel
