> Well as you have the necessary packaging-fu, you could try to add the > Fedora patches which we don't have to the ghostscript package of Mageia 1, > as they have approx. the same version that we have, and they don't have > that problem from what i know. Or simply try first with the cauldron > package, that is the same version as the Fedora one and start from there. > > I could do too, but that would be a really lengthy process as i can't test > it directly. You can get the patches and the SPEC for fedora ghostscript > here: http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/?p=ghostscript.git;a=tree I couldn't be able to build fedora packages, too many unresolved linker symbols, but I added two patches of theirs to our package, more because i think they are usefull, than to solve the HP issue. But again the colors are dareker, the result is better than in mageia 1 however.
I will try to print in fedora, i should have a vm as well
somewhere...
If you want i can commit those changes anyway (they are upstream patches
if i understood correctly).
--
Angelo
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
