On 1 December 2011 13:10, Anssi Hannula <[email protected]> wrote: > On 29.11.2011 17:18, Thomas Backlund wrote: >> Colin Guthrie skrev 29.11.2011 16:04: >>> 'Twas brillig, and Thomas Backlund at 29/11/11 13:21 did gyre and gimble: >>>> Colin Guthrie skrev 29.11.2011 13:53: >>>>> >>>>> OK, spoke with Bastien and he pointed me at the fixes (on the Xserver >>>>> side). >>>>> >>>>> Will push them through shortly (tho' to the xserver 1.11 in >>>>> core/updates_testing only) >>>>> >>>> >>>> I think we should push xserver 1.11 into /release _now_ so it gets >>>> proper testing time from all users before Alpha 2 is released. >>> >>> I'm happy with that but as I don't keep up to date with the binary >>> driver stuff I don't know the impact. >>> >>> Anssi, can you give your €0.02? >>> >> >> fglrx is ok as of fglrx-8.911-1.mga2.nonfree >> >> nvidia-current should be ok afaik. >> >> nvidia173 and nvidia96xx need to be checked, >> as Anssi noted on Nov. 6th that they didn't support it yet then, >> and iirc there has been no new driver release since. >> >> But at some point we really need to move on, as we cant wait forever. > > Agreed, I say go for 1.11. > > nvidia96xx actually wasn't enabled on mga1, I was a bit surprised when > nvidia later added 1.10 support into it. > > And nvidia173 is only needed for FX series, which is relatively uncommon > (when compared to other series). > > -- > Anssi Hannula
Then go for it, testing makes sense especially as the adversely affected user set seems small.
