Op dinsdag 06 december 2011 00:29:03 schreef Anssi Hannula: > On 06.12.2011 00:56, Thomas Backlund wrote: > > Now, > > > > here comes the question about backports once again. [...] > > Using a separate branch is also a cleaner way of providing > > backports, and makes it easy to separate changes needed only > > for Cauldron (or backports). > > Hm, how does this help with enabling backports (i.e. compared to simply > using cauldron repo)?
not sure, but i thought the problem we're facing now was that submitting from cauldron to backports was a "problem" in security scripting, ie: not being able to specify 2 sources? than this would solve that problem?
