On 04.01.2012 18:20, Guillaume Rousse wrote: > Here are a few proposal of mines to make the situation better: > - use a unique file name, enforced by convention, rather than references > in package description, the same way Debian does with README.debian > - display its content only in graphical context: command-line users > usually know about this kind of convention to get information themselves > - use standardised file content and markup to allow rpmdrake and other > graphical tools to achieve the same kind of selection than file > splitting today > - define some kind of policy of what should be there, and what should > not, to achieve minimal consistency
+1 except for the 2nd point; I do want any important information to be shown automatically. For example, I don't check the documentation of each and every package on each and every update for upgrade information. I also agree Johnny, all the information should be shown in the end of the urpmi run, not in the middle of installing packages where one may not notice them. -- Anssi Hannula