On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 5:34 AM, andre999 <[email protected]> wrote: > Maarten Vanraes a écrit : > >> Op maandag 06 februari 2012 08:50:21 schreef Sander Lepik: >> >>> >>> 06.02.2012 09:38, Funda Wang kirjutas: >>> >>>> >>>> And, don't forget, we still have a package named firefox-beta. If we >>>> stick with FF10, then some day we will come to a situation of >>>> firefox-10.0.4 and firefox-beta-15b1 for Mageia 2, which is >>>> unacceptable. Or, we should make an exception on firefox-beta, it >>>> should be obsoleted by updated firefox for stable distros. >>>> > > > The long-term support versions just obsolete lower-numbered > non-long-term-support versions. > > >>> Indeed, firefox-beta must be obsoleted on stable release like chrome's >>> similar versions are as we don't have maintaner who wants to keep them >>> up-to-date on stable releases. >>> I agree with D.Morgan that if we want to continue with ESR version then >>> cauldron will stay on 10.0 (not sure how we can have newer versions of >>> beta if they depend on the same packages). >>> And it's also true that we will lose some users if they don't want to >>> use tarball version and will pick distro that can keep browsers >>> up-to-date. Sad, but true. >>> >>> (Funda, can you please stop top-posting. This is rude man!) >>> >>> -- >>> Sander >>> >> >> possibly if someone has time, they could try to maintain/backport the >> non-ESR >> branch... >> >> but imho, if people want the latest, they don't wait for packagers to >> finish+test it in one week, the get upstream version... >> >> so the other persons are fine with ESR versions... imho >> >> > > +1 > I doubt that we will lose any (or many) users interested in the latest > version, as all distros will be faced with this time lag relative to > upstream. > > -- > André >
I would suggests to stuck on cauldron to version 10.x and in mageia 1 too and to start to update again as soon as cauldron is open again. some objections ?
