Pascal Terjan wrote: > On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 16:13, D.Morgan <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 1:05 AM, David Walser <[email protected]> wrote: >>> There is a fork of procps called procps-ng, which I think lives here: >>> http://www.ohloh.net/p/procps-ng >>> >>> Debian has switched to using it, as can be seen here: >>> http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/p/procps/procps_3.3.2-3/changelog >>> >>> Should we switch to it as well, or stick with procps? >> >> i have not yet looked, but what fedora did ? > > https://gitorious.org/procps says "Debian, Fedora and openSUSE fork of > procps."
Yes, and the Fedora git shows they have switched to it, although they forgot to update the version number.
