On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 09:27, Colin Guthrie <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > I think I've mentioned this before here, but I keep getting tripped up > by this problem giving out false information. > > Is this because the kernel requires it as Requires(pre) and thus it > doesn't show up? Should it show up?
I think this is "normal" If the package can need it later, it should also require it without (pre), else you can uninstall it later as it is only required at the time the %pre is run
